Tag Archives: disorder

self-test

la o prima testare, io arat cam asa:

Personality Disorder Test Results

Paranoid |||||||||||||||| 62%
Schizoid |||||||||||||||| 70%
Schizotypal |||||||||||||| 54%
Antisocial |||||||||||| 46%
Borderline |||||||||||||||| 62%
Histrionic |||||||||||||||| 70%
Narcissistic |||||||||||||| 58%
Avoidant |||||||||||| 46%
Dependent |||||||||||||| 54%
Obsessive-Compulsive |||||||||| 34%

Take Free Personality Disorder Test
personality tests by similarminds.com

(enjoy yourself!)

Advertisements

*

This Be The Verse

by Philip Larkin (1922 – 1985)

They fuck you up, your mum and dad.
They may not mean to, but they do.
They fill you with the faults they had
And add some extra, just for you.

But they were fucked up in their turn
By fools in old-style hats and coats,
Who half the time were soppy-stern
And half at one another’s throats.

Man hands on misery to man.
It deepens like a coastal shelf.
Get out as early as you can,
And don’t have any kids yourself.


Dear colleague,

27 Oct 1906

[…]

I am glad to hear that your Russian girl is a student; uneducated persons are at present too inaccessible for our purposes. The defecation story is nice and suggests numerous analogies [!]. [..] The third to fourth year is the most significant period for those sexual activities which late belong to the pathogenic ones. […] It is not unusual for babies to soil the hands of those who are carrying them. Why should that not have happened in her case? And this awakens a memory of the father’s caresses during her infancy. Infantile fixation of the libido on the father – the typical choice of object; anal autoerotism. […] It must be possible, by the symptoms and even by the character, to recognize anal excitation as a motivation. Such people often show typical combinations of character traits. They are extremely neat, stingy and obstinate, traits which are in a manner of speaking the sublimations of anal erotism. Cases like this based on repressed perversion can be analyzed very satisfactorily.

You see that you have not bored me in the least. I am delighted with your letters.

Sincerest regards,

Yours, Dr. Freud

________________________

* scrisoarea lui Jung este… ma rog, pe celalalt blog al meu. (pentru moment nu inteleg de ce nu pot introduce linkul ala nenorocit.)


his own spider

spider

eram foarte curioasa sa vad ‘spider’-ul lui cronenberg (2002). e cu un tip ‘zdruncinat’, ca sa zic asa. si, cred, o lectie evidenta de psihanaliza. recuperarea si reconstituirea – vezi motivul puzzle-ului – anumitor scene din copilarie; o copilarie puternic marcata oedipian, cu atat mai mult cu cat chiar tatal ii va ucide mama. paralelismul trairilor: atunci si totodata acum, martor exact in momentele lacunare ale copilariei sale, pe care totusi nu trebuie sa uitam ca le ‘umple’ cu ceea ce mintea lui schizoida gandeste. de aceea, nu stim realmente daca tatal chiar si-a ucis sotia si, de fapt, nici nu conteaza asta. maica-sa si cea care-i devine mama vitrega sunt interpretate de aceeasi actrita, iar identitatea se pastreaza uneori si pe linie masculina: el i se substituie propriului tata, ceea ce-mi aminteste de modul in care freud il interpreteaza pe hamlet – tot in cheie oedipiana, desigur: hamlet & claudius sunt de fapt la fel, nutresc pana la urma aceeasi dorinta si de-aia ezita hamlet sa-l ucida, pentru ca-l intelege, claudius i-a implinit – dar pe o cale paradoxala – marea fantezie. in film insa micul spider, intre ura si identificare fata de tata, intre doua tipuri de atractie sexuala (mama si ‘tarfa’) ajunge sa se lase coplesit si apasat de crima, tocmai pentru ca nu stie nici cine e el, nici cine sunt de fapt ceilalti. e interesant deci de urmarit permanentul transfer identitar – de altfel destul de clar, nu de tipul ‘mulholland drive’-ul lui lynch -, atat la nivelul trecutului, cat si in prezentul, care pare sa incerce sa completeze si sa rezolve acele lacune despre care vorbeam. si nu se rezolva nimic.


%d bloggers like this: